Add new comment

What do you mean?

If I take the question in a literal sense, the so far the answer has been yes, as anarchists here and there have acted as first responders in the aftermath of disasters.

If it’s a poetic rhetorical appeal to reconsider such a reaction, then it’s interesting to consider what this would entail.

What would really help someone “trapped beneath the shattered constructions of their fetished lives”?

Maybe they don’t want to renounce to their ruins, to part with them and shelter themselves with disillusionments, or find comfort and a home in wandering.

I think more often than not constructs are not shattered.
They are briefly exposed and vulnerable, but then repaired and bolstered, updated, given all the maintenance that was overdue. These constructs live on long after the elderly have perished.

How can a storm(?)break records, erase documents and registries, erase memory embedded in the material culture, break people away from inhibitions and norms?

I can think of a few ways, but this comment is too long.