Submitted by All Roads Leads... (not verified) on Tue, 02/19/2019 - 05:33
In Sociology there are two world views
- Conflict and Crisis is normal (Marx)
- Consensus is normal. Conflict and Crisis is an interim step to Consensus.
In a VUCA world (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) conflict and crisis is more the norm .
***should anarchists intervene in a crisis?***
Anarchists should be training and building up groups so they are ready when crisis hits. Will their actions help maintain the state or not?
*** Is that even a useful category for thinking about problems?***
It is one framework . VUCA is another. One may yet emerge
***What are better or worse ways you’ve seen this done?***
This is a wide open question. Parallel Structures such as in the American Revolutionary War is the longer way to go.
In Sociology there are two world views
- Conflict and Crisis is normal (Marx)
- Consensus is normal. Conflict and Crisis is an interim step to Consensus.
In a VUCA world (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) conflict and crisis is more the norm .
***should anarchists intervene in a crisis?***
Anarchists should be training and building up groups so they are ready when crisis hits. Will their actions help maintain the state or not?
*** Is that even a useful category for thinking about problems?***
It is one framework . VUCA is another. One may yet emerge
***What are better or worse ways you’ve seen this done?***
This is a wide open question. Parallel Structures such as in the American Revolutionary War is the longer way to go.