Add new comment

I live in Ukraine and the comments in this thread were brought to my attention by a friend.

Mikhail Zhlobitsky was also a communist, not an individualist. His attack did not injure only FSB "agents", as is being reported in the West, but instead also low-tier secretarial workers. It also occurred in the north of Russia proper, and links have never been established between him and anarchists here.

Apparently collateral damage is not a problem for Western anarchists when Marxists are involved?

The Ukrainian anarchists who attacked the cell-tower over a month ago, they talk about things like direct democracy, legitimate governance, and supporting imperialist/nationalist struggles in the Mid-east...and Western anarchists describe them as heroes, and their acts as "savage beauty"?

Meanwhile, those waging war without illusions of making any popular movement or revolution, out of a sense of antihumanism, venegance, or in defense of the natural world, in the memory of the real savages genocided now centuries ago, non-Europeans, these are called ecofascists? Why are their acts of terror invalid?

Will the Western anarchists here please explain or justify this logic? Thank you from the East.