Submitted by anon (not verified) on Wed, 12/11/2019 - 16:21
>Apparently collateral damage is not a problem for Western anarchists when Marxists are involved?
In Russia definition ''anarchist-communist' is still popular because among anarchists Kropotkin is very popular. Any kind of marxism is in strict antagonism with russian anarcho-communists, that is why no marxist would call himself "anarcho".
Dimitry for sure knows about it, however still makes manipulation by replacing "communism" with ''marxism". It is just a trick.
>Apparently collateral damage is not a problem for Western anarchists when Marxists are involved?
In Russia definition ''anarchist-communist' is still popular because among anarchists Kropotkin is very popular. Any kind of marxism is in strict antagonism with russian anarcho-communists, that is why no marxist would call himself "anarcho".
Dimitry for sure knows about it, however still makes manipulation by replacing "communism" with ''marxism". It is just a trick.