Add new comment

There will always be reified referential identity structures. The issue is what anarchists and anarchs do in regards to adjusting to people who hold those beliefs. Anarchy will always represent people with marginal interests that are beyond societal constructions.

There's different types of identity. You have ancestral ID constructs and you have ID that is facilitated by power constructions(think modern demographics as well as the coming psychographic age). The reason anarchists IDpol enablers are such fuck ups is because they enable these constructed reifications instead of undermining them with individuality. There's also the fact that IDpols can feed into new IDs that the source base don't necessarily identify with. A perfect example would be the Latinx construct. Turns out most Latinos don't actually ID with Latinx. This is but one example of politics and ID enforcing each others existence. 1968 black ideology is another good example of acute contrived identity. I can understand this if we are talking about queer ID structures where there is a certain amount of individual self-overcoming but not with scaled demographic construction.

What anarchists and anarchs need to do is balance the dynamics between high and low context culture in regards to ID. There are trade offs to both cultural structures and you see this in the white non white split. You want the high rational intellection without the soullessness on the one hand and soulful intellectual culture on the other hand. IDpol ideology is a bad way to handle these issues of high and low context culture.