Add new comment

"Done before you started? Many of us don't have access to Corrosive Consciousness."

People have uploaded it - it's not hard to find. I'm not sure what you are trying to say with the first question.

"It's confusing what you even still agree of what you wrote there if we did"

I was peak nihilism/Stirner when I wrote it. I believe this only became confusing because John Zerzan kept insisting I had entirely disavowed the book, which is not true. I clarify this in an angry rant on The Brilliant 91.

"Are you not embracing spiritualism and some elements of what's sometimes called reactionary anarchism yourself at this point?"

Yes, but I had not at the time I wrote the piece from which you're quoting (which I believe is the Black Seed one). Depending on your definition of "reactionary" (big, loaded word), I would not necessarily reject the label.

"Has Bellamy read into eco-extremism much at all? How about others here? Or did everyone stop after the accusations of fascism and Atassa controversy?"

Goofy accusations of fascism (no one has ever explained remotely to my satisfaction how an anti-statist, anti-collectivist tendency could possibly be fascist) would not make me stop reading something. I read all of Atassa #1, have read parts of Regresion and Chahta-Ima, yes, but it sounds like you are more well-read than I on EE. Of course I don't disagree with everything they have said, but I am ultimately not misanthropic, not for collective guilt and punishment of humanity, and definitely not ethically or strategically okay with indiscriminate attack.