Add new comment

"People have uploaded it - it's not hard to find. I'm not sure what you are trying to say with the first question."

I've never seen a copy and have been on the lookout for years. Not a newb pirate either. Live somewhere without decent @infoshops and that can't be shipped to. My understanding is that it's also out of print.

"Goofy accusations of fascism (no one has ever explained remotely to my satisfaction how an anti-statist, anti-collectivist tendency could possibly be fascist) would not make me stop reading something."

I agree the fascism comparison is non-sensical.

"...it sounds like you are more well-read than I on EE. Of course I don't disagree with everything they have said, but I am ultimately not misanthropic..."

So you reject misanthropy. How about humanism? Would love to know, here, or on in a blog post, wherever. Not making demand, just curious. I understand I'm not entitled to anything in that way, but it seems a useful convo to have for many folks benefit. Been following your ideas for a while and you seem entangled in a lot of Enlightenment stuff, possibly including humanism?

Ecoextremism rejects strategy altogether. This has been discussed in Regresion and the other Mexican zines. Eco-extremists don't view murder as a strategy, for example it's understood around three hundred million people would need to die annually just to counteract the birthrate, which is so incredibly ridiculous. Eco-extremists are therefore not genocidal or xenocidal, as they understand the totality of the German state pre-WWII and during killed six million, Stalin forty million. Even the worst genocides, Columbian contact and that of Genghis Khan, sixty and forty million respectively, led to negligible amounts of "rewilding" and less than half a degree of tempature difference via the removal of carbon producing human activity.

Indiscriminate attack is also misunderstood. I assure you ITS isn't killing randomly. As probably even state security knows, there's method to the "madness". Ironically, it is similar with all multiple murderers. That method is nihilistic terrorism. Not political terrorism for pressure or a demand or goal. It serves as a reminder of the brutality that exists within the human animal, and wild nature (more on that at the end), when the thinnly-veiled veneer of the state is peeled back. It's what the rejection of humanism looks like in action. Active nihilism. It's something earlier anarchist terrorists embraced. An unapologeticism. Ecoextremists don't pretend people die for some "greater good" like social anarchists and communists. It's the tankies who want to create great statist war apparatuses and systemtically purge people for a self-aacknowledge class dictatorship. The ecoextremist, like Frankensteins monster, is galvanized by certain forces, sometimes unknown, into action. As the latest ITS communique writes: "We look at you with hatred, your celebrations disgust us, you created us and now face the consequences."

Finally, ecoextremists don't give a fuck about the abstraction that is "the human", this spook "TaoistSlut" keeps bringing up. They don't care if the human is pitiful or not, master or slave, burger or prole. It's not a sense of Nietzschean aristocraticism. It's that the human is a bogus concept, a very manufactured lie, something out of Feuerbach — the inverted abrahamic God. Neither is "wild nature" some empty catch-term. It is an acknowledgment of the Dionysian, the Dao, the abyss of cosmic chaos, of Pan. It's not biocentric moralism. It's an acknowledgment that the human isn't the perfected end-state of billions of years of biological and cosmic "evolution". It's an acknowledgement that there are inescapable laws of nature, like there's an inescapable law of gravity (see Quinn's Ishmael), and that if our species jumps off a cliff expecting to fly it can only lead to a fastly approaching ending. That when we oppose certain authorities, when we seek freedom from certain constraints, we'll end up being wiped out in the end.