Add new comment

anon (not verified)
not the other commenter but

ok... so is your contention being that the author does not adhere to your Left ID politics as much as you'd like, that they aren't pro-socialism enough, or both?

You got socio-economic modes of production of daily life that are always favoring the most brutal and aberrant aspects of mankind. Like how is the latest State-supported demolition of a prehistoric indigenous archeological site by Rio Tinto in Australia would have been prevented if their shareholders were, say, Black trans women? What would have made a socialist government any more sensible to such issues as to make them forbid billionaires and their infatile grunt workers from doing this shit?

It's clear to me that what's causing oppression of minorities will not be solved by just a management facelift... Or by making males in charge be more feminine in appearance. Not even women in charge would change it, even if the power dynamics might change in some way.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
C
Q
X
Q
K
S
)
(
Enter the code without spaces.