Add new comment

Anarchy is ahistorical. There are historical epochs however that can be more conducive to anarchy facilitating itself.

You're not wrong about the renaissance, however, I like to focus on the polymath knowledge aspect of that era. There's also scientific enterprises that did not come from gatekept centralized sources. I find that preferable to more imperial civilized epochs.

You missed my point about Ventura. I don't care for him personally, but someone like him is what it would take to keep the Washington construct afloat away from the plutocratic context that cannot go on much longer before some type of Caesarian charismatic figure comes along. Again, I'm being descriptive not prescriptive.