Add new comment

Sorry to keep commenting, but I keep reading and am amazed at the ignorance in almost every line of this post. For example, Landstreicher, in passing, mockingly says "[that delightful, abstract “they”]". Again, he misses that this "they" which is always capitalized in Tiqqun's and the Invisible Committee's writings, is a reference to Heidegger's concept of "das Man," which translates to "the one" or "the they" or "the people," referring to inauthenticity. Whereas for Landstreicher, this "they" is just a vague outgrowth of immature thought, for anyone who has actually studied this stuff (which would have qualified you to have written this post) this "they" is a sophisticated reference to Heidegger.