Add new comment

Anarchism is not the default catch-all for all things non-state.
Though it is true that anarchism is more about lived values, than about naming and quoting authors, these values and desires extend beyond those mentioned in this article.

This article mentions "Individualism, community, self-sufficiency, self-reliance, and faith [...] Appalachian anarchism is a syncretic philosophy that combines Christian anarchism with individualist anarchism along with aspects of traditionalist conservatism and agrarianism. It is Christian anarchist in that faith is held dear to Appalachians who let the Bible guide them, despite 70% being unchurched and their native Christianity being decentralized and opposed to religious hierarchy and established churches. It is individualist in its opposition to communism and acceptance of self-reliance and self-sufficiency. It is traditionalist conservative in its views of social issues, being opposed to abortion and supportive of the traditions of the mountains among others. It is agrarian in its support of the back-to-the-land movement’s components, namely smallholding, self-sufficiency, community, and autonomy. All these mix together to create an individualist and conservative anarchism."

Meanwhile the gist of anarchism summarized in the slogan "No gods, no masters", which extends to no governments, no rulers, no hierarchies, which of course means no patriarchy (which implies body autonomy that goes much further beyond the topic of abortion and contraception, freedom from patriarchal notions of family and coupling), no ageism, no racism, and no speciesm. "God-fearing" men and women does not sound so free to me. Living in fear means living under coercion. Christianity, even without the vatican, has patriarchal trappings, and lacks the means to provide or inform living freely in many areas.

This is just another case of wishful thinking looking around expecting to find an anarchist utopia under a rock if you just look close enough and squint. Hoping to stumble into a new untapped source of critical mass. Looking at anything that isn't the most techno-euphoric and enthusiastic statism and saying "Look! These people live far away from the city. Is this anarchy? Eh, close enough." It's the "normal everyday people" that are more real and authentic that the anarchists, our noble savages we can look to. The rural periphery is whole new world activism can make inroads after unions and student organizing becomes stale. Why not help organize an anti-abortion rally and shoot-up an abortion clinic? Not saying that's what the article proposes, but it's not exactly critiquing it either. Oh well, so they didn't vote for a mayor. Neither did most of the people that are complicit with the status quo, since low voter participation is the norm in U.S.A.

Anarchists don't have ownership over "doing whatever I want" and "minding my own business", most people do, acting according to their interests, cooperating or not. That's the point, the state is an imposition and an illusion, it's not everywhere it intends and presumes to project control. People are not so obedient. You can learn from anyone who evades and resists the state, without trying to force them into your pet notions of anarchy. Like when anarchists become fascinated with indigenous or aboriginal cultures, or the zapatistas or rojava and feel the urge to call them anarchist in order for them to be allowed to like them and be interested in learning about them or from them. Why not focus on what you can bring as well? If everyone is already an anarchist, then anarchy achieved, or no one is.