Add new comment

If someone thinks that gender can be eliminated, he is likely to say a "truth (truth as a lie)" - a Messiah truth. Such a truth is extremely empty, and does not conform to the ethics of anarchism, because its means and purposes are contrary. On the surface, such a view abolished gender politics, but its means was actually Hegel's Dialectics of master and slave, just like saying that it was necessary for the proletariat to maintain its identity until the Messiah of history came, when both masters and slaves would be abolished. So it is precisely because of such messianic slogans that identity politics is preserved.
This view of "communism" is far from the level of anarchy. Because it doesn't reach the essence of chaos. The nature of this chaos is determined by biology. For example, in a single gender society without women, women are automatically differentiated among men. There are many examples of this in biology. If we regard the abolition of gender as the Messiah, it will not solve any problem. But if we start from biology, we get infinite inspiration (in Hegel's terms, it is classified as evil infinity).
Sex conversion, that is to say, biology tells us that there is still a kind of androgynous plant character in animal sex. So here we find the chaos of gender: both sexes coexist in fragmented ways. It is divided into two series: homosexuality and sexual perversion. But it's not traditional identity politics, it's chaos. I think this is more in line with the anarchist approach.
Deleuze has a wonderful exposition of this in his Proust and symbols. This book is usually ignored, but in fact, it plays an important role in connecting the past and the future.