Add new comment

which is to ignore the stupid comment that we're all responding to, because the comment is not helpful, but to respond instead to a valid point. so yes, all the things you want to say about the stupid comment, fine.
but you haven't really answered my question, which is, how do you (all you yous out there) feel about the idea of waiting to attack until you know a place, vs focusing only on the validity of attack everything all the time.
surely both of those directions can be overloaded in ways that don't work for us?

and also,
how does one decide what to attack, since we don't actually attack everything all the time. why this church and not that one? why this ATM and not that one? if it's convenience, what does that mean, given that it's not random what we (WE! WE! i know) find convenient...