Add new comment

the believer in the said ideology. To an an-cap, capitalism is a political system, and all political systems use ideology to a degree. Only a few people from radical-leftism/anarchism would call it an ideology because historically it's more of a tool and currencies propagated by authoritarian societies have been around for a very long time.

In response to the above article, the only problem i have with this type of behavior is that smashing windows addressing none of the the problems that make these activists want to rebel. Sure, it's egoism, and perhaps the joy of breaking something is more valuable to everyone than society's lists of proposals for reforming oppression.

Property destruction has the merit of disrupting the ossified set of activities that allow for capitalism's torment to continue, but obviously killing the people involved in perpetuating oppression would be theoretically more efficient. Yet, personally i think a lot of the little things that people do on a daily basis to express themselves and preserve their own sanity are just as bad as so called "oppression". For example, I would get much more satisfaction out of hurting or killing the people who habitually use telecommunications devices to bully and harass people than I would out of mailing a bomb to some technocrat. That's already been done by several different people and clearly it doesn't create a roadblock for technocracy.