Add new comment

As written by Benito. Usually it's best to define an ideology as stated by the ideologues themselves.

Also the term of abuse was originally said by H L Mencken back in the day(Bob Black recited it). It IS a term of abuse and antifa discourse , for the most part, a rallying call and deployment by liberal and universalist ideologues to get other marginals to put out of fire they started via modern capital and state. Liberal bourgeois ideology essentially becomes the too big to fail object at this point and fascism becomes a trumped up(pun intended) enemy that gets in the way of the smooth functioning of capital and state.

Quite frankly fascisms novelty was always tied to early 20th century corporatism and autarky. It has no historical drive outside of that time period beyond nostalgic cultural larp as well as perhaps an aide to the emerging new psychographics of the 21st century in a similar vein to how the new left played a role in ending fordism. The altright might have a similar novel role in changing technologies and new psychographic developments but it will be nothing like the 20s and 30s just as the far left in the later 20th C was nothing like the old left as far as potency goes. You might get a Steve Jobs equivalent of emerging technology who use to be a Kekistani meme warrior, but that's about it.