Add new comment

Positivism research based on morality is a kind of pseudo science, which always tends to arm a politically correct proposition with selective facts. First of all, the science of political interference is morally incorrect; second, it only serves specific political issues, which is more beneficial to politicians and the upper class than to the poor. There are a lot of pseudo science in the service of politics on the Internet, which is very dangerous.

There is an obvious attribution fallacy: power leads to immorality. But the most fundamental reason is that it has no clear composition of modern power, so it can only be regarded as serving an established oppressive value. As a matter of fact, this article selectively evades too many facts in order to expound its own views. For example, many people who support the far right come from the oppressed class. What's the matter? From Europe in the Middle Ages to the Middle East, most of the supporters of the moral craze come from the very traditional bottom. There is an amazing fact that many numbness, selfishness, indifference and murder come from the oppressed.

Similarly, standing in the position of the proletariat, Marx is actually a very cold man. What's the matter? A kind of male rationalism culture just caters to a kind of numb mind. It's really about power, but it's not because of the master, because masculine rationalism is the manifestation of slavery.

On the other hand, Marxist theory ridicules bourgeois positivism fundamentally. So this article is totally contradictory. It is just a piece of rubbish to attack Nietzsche's philosophy, and completely exposes the ignorance and stupidity of power.