Add new comment

The author's intention is obviously corresponding to "Professor lobster". But his position is a kind of "civil religion", which uses Christian morality (such as social sympathy and love) to defeat the contemporary right, because the latter tries to use lobster's society to justify hierarchy. According to the author, this is a manifestation of "power leads to immorality", while some facts of baboon society are just the opposite.

But it's not that simple. Don't you find that they made the same mistake code? The so-called "Professor lobster" is just a joke. Only another joke will take him seriously, such as Zizek. The folly lies in the fact that the Rightists regard their success as a symbol of "master" and "strong", but this is only a manifestation of Hegelianism, which is just a vain attempt to occupy a master position as a mirage. Master slave dialectics only judges master and slave from symptoms, but the so-called "master" is only the projection of slave psychology. The success of the Rightists depends on the equality of capitalism and metaphysics, but the fools believe that it is their own credit. But on the other hand, the left tried to repeat such a Christian equality, believing that democracy can be achieved by adhering to the ethics of the weak, but this idea is exactly the nourishment of the right, which always creates new tyrants.

In fact, this kind of civil religion is ethically interlinked with the most conservative politics. They fight on the surface and unite behind the scenes. Firstly, the source of positivism is theology. Secondly, such a civil religion is actually a product of global capitalism. Some people mistakenly think it is "imperialism". There is no fundamental conflict between it and evangelical politics.

But these obvious things, why do I know, and you don't? ——Because of the arrogance and stupidity of power.