Add new comment

Examining this quote, which was placed before the on the one you discussed, should clarify your misunderstanding:

"The suicide bomber is the muse of our time. They do not inspire us to sing of freedom, justice, and dignity but of consequence.”
[...] Terror - The primary modality of class society, whether it is by violence, hunger, or the threat of the elements. If every object, person, and moment is for sale, if there is nothing outside, then there is abject terror. When living is a contemptible act, it is terror. What is the opposite of this?" - from "Anarchy and Nihilism: Consequences"

That “They do not inspire us to sing of freedom, justice, and dignity but of consequence.” is a critique, not commending them for that.

If it does not celebrate life and beauty and joy, but merely sees itself as mechanism for effects, then “ living is a contemptible act” i.e. “terror” and them immediately asks. “What is the opposite of this?”

I think A!’s project is one way of answering of how a project looks like when one commits to life and living, overcoming terror. That is also reflected in his other writings and quotes.