Add new comment

Unlike you, Shawn, I don't make a project out of searching out all the most obscure and dated material from whatever source, then trying to pass it off to contemporary anarchists as something from which they will be able to derive something - anything - of real value to their own theory and practice. What was interesting and relevant to anarchists a hundred years or more ago may be less so now - times change, values change, theory and practice must change, too.

I'm not worried that many anarchists will be tempted to follow you down your intellectual rabbit hole, but when I see you dumping your crap on this web site week after week, I can't resist the opportunity to show just how hollow and self-serving your whole approach is. My own reading, such as it is, tends to focus on issues and ideas that are clearly relevant to my current concerns as an anarchist , whether or not the authors themselves identify as anarchists (that much you and I would agree on). I'll just toss out a few articles and authors that have impressed me over the past thirty or so years:

Bob Black (everybody's favorite whipping boy): particularly The Abolition of Work

Saul Newman: Anarchism, Marxism, and the Bonapartist State

Mark Lance: Fetishizing Process

John Zerzan

James C. Scott: Against the Grain

Todd May: Post-Structuralist Anarchism

Untying the Knot: Feminism, Anarchism, and Organization

Jacques Ellul: The Technological Society and Propaganda

Willem Vanderburg: The Labyrinth of Technology

Peter Gelderloos: A Critical History of Harrisonburg Food Not Bombs

Many articles in magazines and journals like Anarchy: Journal of Desire Armed, Green Anarchy, Fifth Estate, Social Anarchism, and Anarchist Studies Journal.