Add new comment

"my thought is it [learning an indigenous language] can and will happen if anarchists actually spent time with speakers of the language, and more importantly felt driven to learn it."

sure. But like, this is just a pretty involved topic. There aren't that many people who speak the language these days, because it was suppressed; there is a movement to revive the language, but resources and time are quite limited. I feel like it is a weird thing to talk about in the abstract, personally, in the absence of real relationships where this would make sense to do. Maybe some people have personal relationships, but as a collectivity, there is no currently relationship between "Montréal anarchists" (or other radicals) writ large, and even a significant subset of local Kanien'kéha:ka, where we are being asked to learn Kanien'kéha. If anything, it seems to be a fantasy/preoccupation of a small subset of settlers (here and elsewhere) to think about learning indigenous languages, tell friends you're learning these languages, pepper documents with these languages, etc., in a way that... well, I consider it a bit problematic. But hey, maybe someone will endeavour to write something more interesting on this topic, whether from an anarchist perspective or not (and I would certainly read it)

Anyway, it is worth saying, accessibility (in general) is a concern of the Montreal Anarchist Bookfair Collective, but this text is not just about accessibility for Spanish speakers or accessibility in general. It is, in fact, critical of an intellectual overcommitment to an "accessibility lens", and it talks about a bunch of other things too.

Of course, everything should be translated to every other language possible. But, that's obvious...