Add new comment

I haven't read the issue of "Perspectives," so I can't comment usefully. But the disagreement with the postanarchists — as far back as "What's Wrong with Postanarchism?" — has always been about rejecting distinctions and oppositions that seem poorly supported by the facts. The "classical" anarchists often had very complex understandings of power. Stirner isn't the Glorious Exception. And so on...