Add new comment

Since the classicization of culture and knowledge leads to systematic atrocities, the rebellion is undoubtedly a counter-cultural movement. That is why it is important to understand the process of repression, rather than treating counter-culture as some sort of 70s tradition. It is like saying that the Marxist-Leninist state launched the model theater, which performed the revolution as some kind of ideology, because it wanted to form a representative revolutionary power. But this culture is a repression of the population and a serious obstacle to creative passion.
On the one hand there is the cultural desert of the revolution, and on the other hand there is the cultural desert created by capitalism. The bad culture they created not only stifled the revolution itself, but also the passion for anger. Like Occupy Wall Street, it fundamentally lacks a deep-seated anger and a deeper cultural basis for rebellion.
There is a deeper reason. The reason for the lack of imagination that accompanies cultural deserts is that classical socialism is driven differently than imagination. Millennial politics was promoted by " cultured intellectuals " for the governance of the City of God.So it has nothing to do with imagination.
So counter-culture is still a worthwhile investment. If once great writers or movements have become classics, where are the new writers, movements and practices? People often ignore them.
Another thing to note is that this era of TV/PC gaming is extremely different from the past. Perhaps those immersed in the punk movement need a change of mind.