Submitted by SirEinzige on Fri, 10/01/2021 - 15:18
As far as I'm concerned that essay should be a 101 go-to read of why anarchy and egoism is not communism. I would only add and adjust and say the pole against communism isn't capitalism but propertarianism which is also obviously not on. Anarchism, beginning with Proudhon and Stirner, was essentially a rejection of both. Proudhon found a middle position, Stirner did something else entirely, outside of the thought realm of societal form and existent permanence.
Anarchy is simply neither communist or propertarian.
As far as I'm concerned that essay should be a 101 go-to read of why anarchy and egoism is not communism. I would only add and adjust and say the pole against communism isn't capitalism but propertarianism which is also obviously not on. Anarchism, beginning with Proudhon and Stirner, was essentially a rejection of both. Proudhon found a middle position, Stirner did something else entirely, outside of the thought realm of societal form and existent permanence.
Anarchy is simply neither communist or propertarian.