Add new comment

All I said at first is how "Black anarchism" is meaningless. There's no point in combining these words. Not only because the only valid color of anarchism is already black... (CHECKMATE, IDIOT! lol) but more importantly because it was never about any racial ID pols, no matter how it has obviously grown within a "White" Euro context.

I gotta also second SE's broken clock here, in how skin color (tone is more accurate, as we're all shades of brown, really) does not carry any ideological, cultural, moral content. Skin color is not even a character of ethnicity.,,, This is a hardly meaningful way to relate to as an individual, and even as culturally or ethnically-defined group (the countless tribal and national conflicts in Black Africa still stands as obvious examples).

I never said there's no place for anarchist sentiment and ideas in Black social ethnographic milieus. That's the other, racist commenter here who said that, claiming that "anarchism is a White people's thing". And that doesn't change the fact that similar ideas, sentiments, expressed in a common language, renders racial identity irrelevant, as it becomes a matter of building liberties together, regardless of what social enclave we're from.