Skip to main content
We create the anarchy we want in the world
Raoul Vaneigem has died at the age of 92: one of the greatest inspirations of May '68 has passed away

From entrevue.fr by Jerome Goulon

The Belgian philosopher, writer, and libertarian thinker Raoul Vaneigem has died at the age of 92. A central figure in the Situationist International alongside Guy Debord, he passed away in Barcelona on the night of July 28-29. His work, marked by a radical critique of consumer society and a defense of individual liberty, profoundly influenced the events of May 68. 

The author of A Treatise on Etiquette who marked a generation

Born on March 21, 1934, in Lessines, Belgium, Raoul Vaneigem studied Romance philology before joining the Situationist International in 1961. He quickly became one of the leading theorists of this revolutionary movement, which sought to denounce the alienation caused by market society and consumerism. In 1967, he published A guide to etiquette for younger generationsThe book resonated immensely in student and intellectual circles. Its ideas, like those developed by Guy Debord in The Performing Arts Societyfueled the protests that erupted a few months later in May 68. 

A libertarian mindset that remained true to its convictions

After leaving the Situationist International in 1970, Raoul Vaneigem pursued a career as a writer and philosopher. He published dozens of works devoted to individual emancipation, the critique of power, medieval heresies, and self-management. Unlike other figures of his generation, he never abandoned his libertarian convictions. Until the end of his life, he continued to write and defend a society founded on freedom, the joy of living, and the rejection of all forms of domination. 

An influence that extends far beyond May 68

While his name remains inextricably linked to May '68, Raoul Vaneigem's influence extends far beyond this single historical event. Several of his phrases have become emblematic and have resonated through the decades, fueling the reflections of numerous generations of activists, intellectuals, and writers. His work continues to be studied in universities and remains an essential reference for understanding the history of Situationism and contemporary protest movements. 

A disappearance mourned in the intellectual world

The announcement of his death prompted numerous tributes in literary, philosophical, and libertarian circles. Publishers, authors, and readers alike mourned the passing of a thinker who, for nearly sixty years, tirelessly defended a profoundly free and critical vision of society. With the death of Raoul Vaneigem, one of the last great living figures of the Situationist International and one of the intellectuals who have most profoundly shaped the history of ideas in Europe since the second half of the 20th century has disappeared. 

Comments

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/04/2026 - 11:57

The author could try to dial back the bourgeois grandiosity and hero worship a bit. His contribution to the S.I. was the more self-indulgent adjacent to hippie stuff facet of what they were about. This goes far in explaining the legs it has among West Coast a-political drop outs.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/04/2026 - 12:20

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I haven't read Bookchin yet, but he may well have more useful insights for an anti-capitalist fight in the 21st century than mister libertine self-indulgence is subversive of capitalist order. Consumer society beat the hippies on that score a long, long time ago.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/04/2026 - 13:55

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

if all you want is to fight capitalism, then maybe you want to read some foucault or vaneigem after all. sounds like you don't need to read bookchin, unless you only want to read people you already agree with. 

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/04/2026 - 15:56

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Defrocked Maoist Foucault? Fuck no.
Actually, I did read part of 'Discipline and Punish.' I boosted it from a corporate-ish bookstore I worked at in SF. Somewhat interesting, but he was avowedly not a revolutionary. And neither was Vaneigem, from what I saw. A nice old feller, from my encounters with him while crashing in the same apartment in Barcelona in the spring of 2014.

SirEinzige Thu, 08/06/2026 - 02:19

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

You're talking to Kevin Keating dude. He's an anachronistic retard who wants to ultraleftify radicalism in a 21st century where none of that late-70s Italian crap works anymore. He's a revolution larper who never rose to the level of a Bob Black or Wolfi Landstreicher who's ideas WILL be part of the century to come.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 07:11

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

He was a revolutionary, on a daily basis, spontaneously, by just being a non-ideological non-binary non-hierarchical, non-exploitive, easy going benevolent individualist who had borrowed some concepts from Marx, and re-evolved them.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 07:39

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

There is nothing revolutionary about that. Revolution means a total overturning of the social order. If anything, what you post unintentionally argues that what Vaneigem was about was, in a wholly passive way, counter-revolutionary. "The philosophers have only interpreted the world. The point, however, is to change it."

Get thee to a Forever 21...

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 09:14

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

a total overturning of the social order includes how we interpret the world. 

 

why are you here talking to people if you have knee-jerk thoughtless "overturning" to attend to?

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 13:32

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

I disagree, your type of "total overthrow" revolution is just a facade, the same collective minds have only changed the team-game, the hive, and its coaches, queens and owners, the paradigm is still the same. Different myths to worship with more discreet ownership, but still driven by the collective uniformed libidinal desires.
I am going to live on my own like a solitary soldier ant who ignores the phenols of obedience which drive all my fellow ants in their predictable hive. I may still eat bread crumbs and walk the same trail, but my conscience is my own, and I will make occasional detours off the beaten ant trail to contemplate my own ideas, do my own things. I will not kill other ants, I will enlighten them! I will not burn down their nests, I will just ignore them. If they come for me, I will escape and journey to another crevasse in the ground where I can still live with my ideas. Let their hive do unto other hives what their binary thinking always does, I don't care, I will survive and rescue any revolutionary individual ants who request assistance. I'm a kind everyday sort of ant guy who loves ants.

SirEinzige Thu, 08/06/2026 - 02:29

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

Of course an ultraleft anachronistic retard like you would pull out that retarded Marx quote on change(which we've had plenty of for 200 years with things staying the same) Revolution is overrated at best and authoritarian inducing and reintroducing at worst. Given that you're a proto-leninist vanguard we all know what happens if your discourse ever had its day. It won't though, late 20th revolution rhetoric doesn't work and people like you who hold on to it will become historical curiosities.

RIP to Raoul who was very much a Stirnerian influenced thinker. His ideas will make a comeback not yours.

anonymous (not verified) Thu, 08/06/2026 - 06:51

In reply to by SirEinzige

One example of solitary ants is the Myrmecina species, which exhibit unique nesting habits. They often create small, individual nests within soil or leaf litter and rely on their own foraging efforts to gather food. Solitary ants tend to have shorter lifespans than social ants and often focus on reproduction during peak seasons. This leads to distinct population dynamics, as they do not have the colony support that social species rely on.

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 08/04/2026 - 13:47

"ABOLIR LA PRÉDATION, REDEVENIR HUMAIN: A call for the global creation of collectivities that struggle for a free and authentic human life"
by Raoul Vaneigem
2024, January
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/raoul-vaneigem-a-call-for-the-global-creation-of-collectivities-that-struggle-for-a-free-and-au

Raoul Vaneigem author page on The Anarchist Library:
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/raoul-vaneigem

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 09:17

"developed by Guy Debord in The Performing Arts Society"

Ah, no, that's TOTALLY WRONG.

anonymous (not verified) Wed, 08/05/2026 - 20:37

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

at first I thought the same, then I pondered a second and realized it is quite apt. I also looked it up in my French/English dictionary and what do you know "spectacle" in French can mean several things, one of which is "show business." to me, that just adds a layer of flavor to how I think about my English translation of SOTS.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
H
U
h
P
v
G
$
Y
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.