From Freedom News by Jonathan Eibisch

A fascist in the White House, and the ‘traffic lights’ go out in Germany

The promised turning point is clearly coming much louder than many would have expected. Why do anarchists care who is in government, one might ask. In fact, the ruling order remains the same precisely because of the replacement of its political decision-makers. One thing is clear: the neoliberal-technocratic model of government is being replaced by the protectionist-nationalist model in this phase. And ironically, both are still sides of the same coin.

Democrats need not be surprised why fascists are taking over the bastions of political power one after the other: social security has been systematically dismantled since the turn of the millennium, public infrastructure has been left to rot, corrupt super-rich people have not been kept in check, and political rights have been restricted. It is correct to say that the protectionist-nationalist model of government is not fascist in itself. However, as a counter-revolutionary avant-garde, fascism plays the role of an integrating element in the reactionary and aggressive project of securing power.

Meanwhile in the Federal Republic of Germany, since it was switched on, the ‘traffic lights government’ has been attacked by conservatives. What initially made some people want change increasingly seemed like an imposition for other parts of the population. Despite different population compositions and narratives, the core issues of the formation of camps in North America and Europe are the same: the lines of conflict run along economic models, the handling of migration and cultural issues. Even if state and federal politics are two different things, this applies to both levels. This is creating new constellations, while the camp of supporters of a socially equal, liberal democracy is becoming increasingly smaller and moving closer together.

The Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance would have liked to become a stepping stone for the future state government – but wanted to take on this role only on its own terms. As far as the federal government was concerned, the issue was ostensibly the insoluble controversy over economic policy, in which Christian Lindner stuck to the neoliberal dogma of not taking on any more national debt – as if the state were not sovereign over money itself. There were probably many other issues in the background. Above all, however, the FDP wanted to save its ass in order to distance itself from the red-green coalition before the regular election date next autumn. This strategy may also lead it to insignificance, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.

A lot of it was used in the USA too: enormous sums of money, overreaching campaigners’ involvement, celebrity appearances and propaganda battles on social media – which experience shows are not unaffected by some foreign interests. None of this helped Kamala Harris. Although it seemed like a smart move to bring her into the field when Uncle Biden mentally abdicated, the Democratic Party failed to appeal to those large sections of the population that were now miles away from them: white men with a low level of education. Nevertheless, Trump was elected in a wide variety of countries, by a wide variety of groups. The reasons for this are complex, or at least multiple. But you can only understand Trump’s voters and his electoral success if you understand a collective rationality in voting decisions when they occur en masse. This consists in the fact that the fronts should be clarified, prosperity defended and things finally get back to “normal”.

In all cases, a considerable number of citizens are clearly  demanding that politics be made again. They are looking for points of friction, want to identify the enemy, strive for power and ultimately question the system. Where there is sawing, there are chips.

The political landscape continues to change rapidly – but what are the anarchists doing? First of all, they would do well not to allow themselves to be carried away by the political spectacle. It is precisely the superficiality of the bourgeois democrats that leads to their chronic misunderstanding of neo-fascism, as well as to the ignorance and suppression of social movements. But then it would be important to establish themselves as a conscious, active factor with a shared vision.

Broken down, this means that you need a toolbox for flexible, low-hierarchy, autonomous and federated groups, a common value base and culture, and a shared set of basic theoretical assumptions. This does not mean forcing all anarchists into a unified organisation with a clear program and leadership structures. In my opinion, it means organising in the first place.

Instead, in the broad left-wing scene you encounter an unconscious, comfortable bunch of scattered and insecure individuals who talk at the same time, do not think in the long term or in terms of goals that can be achieved. It is a pitiful game that I will address elsewhere. The political upheavals in particular should motivate reorganisation. Anyone who is still running around like a bunch of cackling chickens has not heard the shot.

Comments

anon (not verified) Thu, 11/07/2024 - 09:10

oh how I wish here in the US anarchists had this sort of analysis. but perhaps it is because we are in the belly of the beast and perspective from such a position is difficult, we being too caught up in the affective rhetoric to notice the on the ground actuality.

it seems that the ruling classes know that climate change has already caused major disruption and is only going to cause more. they seem to want the cash from decimating Earth and don't care what havoc they cause, but they certainly don't want the huddled masses showing up on these shores any longer. Hence the shifting mode of oppression. maybe they really do think they can escape to Mars. or are they trying to immanentize the eschaton?

I think these questions are important for anarchists here to consider, even though we seem to have irreconcilable factions.

"This leads to three broad questions:

With what vision do we confront the existing system of domination? How can our alternative ideas be put into practice in the here and now? What conditions can we use to concretize and popularize these?"

"But then it would be important to establish themselves as a conscious, active factor with a shared vision."

shared enough to make a change at least.

lumpy (not verified) Mon, 11/11/2024 - 12:14

In reply to by anon (not verified)

here's a little gem i stumbled on the other day: it's about nailing shut the coffin of leftist reformism, for these "anarchists" you mentioned, still smoking that copium pipe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=8YWe89X4vRM

basically, the autopsy on cambridge analytica and beyond. ever since Chris Wylie had his little "am-i-a-queer-traitor?!" breakdown and blew the whistle in 2018, THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY ANYMORE. Not even a sham one. You can't have a lottery and sell tickets if the whole thing is completely rigged. You can't play poker if the dealer keeps swapping out the card decks in the middle of the game.

look, i'm a grumpy old anarchist, i've despised liberal democracy for most of my adult life, i positively loathe every halfwit liberal yuppie scumbag for thinking a capitalist democracy was ever anything but a sham and thin pretext for colonial domination. i hate them almost as much as the far right, sometimes even more!

BUT ... this Chris Wylie kid and the tech people like him, they've hacked the masses brains and they can see enough of the source code now, it's game over for whatever the old game was. people bickering about the elections and what they think it means are arguing about angels dancing on the head of a pin.

these tech fuckers can use their meta-data to instantly locate your weird uncle and ghost hack his brain because he's anxious about credit card debt and flip him in to a trump voter. a few clicks and a few months of brain worms and BAM!

don't take my word for it, watch the video. various NATO gov'ts are quietly freaking out about all this shit right now, it's hilarious!

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
K
V
p
#
6
T
E
v
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.